GPA rejects claims it took its eye off the ball in 'Super 8' debate

01 March 2017

GPA CEO Dermot Earley speaks at GAA Congress.
©INPHO/James Crombie.

The GPA has come out fighting against accusations that it failed to properly consult with players in advance of the debate on the 'Super 8' motion which received the green light at Congress.

The player body's Chief Executive Officer Dermot Earley was one of the few dissenting voices to the plan at Croke Park last Saturday but questions have been raised as to why they waited until last Thursday before releasing a statement outlining that 70% of their membership was opposed to the Padraic Duffy backed motion.

They have since been accused of taking their eye off the ball during the consultation process but issued a statement last night refuting these claims...

“The Gaelic Players Association would like to clarify a number of points made in the wake of last weekend’s GAA Congress and the passing of Motion 4.

“The GPA has engaged extensively with our members with regard to competition reform over the past 18 months in the form of surveys, squad meetings, regional workshops, the establishment of a steering group of current and former players and through a multitude of communications providing information and seeking input and feedback at various junctures.

“The most recent consultation with all inter-county squads was to ascertain a consensus as to how the sole GPA vote at Congress would be employed.

“Over 70% of squads expressed a wish to vote against this proposal. The reasons for the player opposition to this proposal have already been outlined.

“Following the initial release of the ‘GAA’s Proposal on The Revised Format of the All-Ireland Championships’ last year, the Players' body actively sought opinions of all squads and reconvened the steering group who considered the proposals.

“It should also be noted that following extensive work in bringing forward a new competitions model, the Players' own proposals were dismissed by the GAA partly on the basis that they contained more games.

“While the players' body accepts the decision of Congress, we will continue to consult with all inter-county players whose views will determine the next course of action for the GPA in relation to structures in both hurling and football. The players’ views will also be represented through the GAA/GPA Player Policy Forum, a newly established committee arising from the 2016 GAA/GPA Agreement.

“The following is an outline of the GPA engagement with players on competition structure reform over the past 18 months:

  • May-July 2015 All players and squads encouraged to submit to GPA views on competition structures.
  • October 2015 Players unveil Football Competitions restructure discussion document.
  • December 2015 Players’ body is the first group to submit a proposal to GAA on the reform of football competitions.
  • January 2016 GPA proposal is rejected by GAA. Further consultation takes place with squad reps on next steps.
  • Proposal for a B Championship for Division 4 counties is put forward by GAA.
  • Following consultation with affected players GPA announces that relevant squads will boycott any new competition.
  • February 2016 motion for B Championship is withdrawn before going to Congress.
  • March 2016 regional Student workshops conducted across 5 venues with 3rd Level students where feedback was sought on competition structures.
  • May 2016 as part of a series of nationwide regional workshops across 8 venues with GPA members, further consultation on competition structure is carried out.
  • August 2016 GAA’s Proposal on Revised Format of the All Ireland Championships released – copy of proposal sent to all members with feedback sought.
  • September 2016 meeting of GPA Football Competitions Steering Group.
  • September 2016 consultation with GPA squad reps on GAA Proposal to gather squad views on GAA Proposal.
  • October 2016 GAA release updated Proposal Document.
  • October 2016 GPA circulate full document to all members, with separate explanation of key points in the proposal. All players provided with opportunity to present views on updated proposal.
  • October 2016 GPA present results of squad feedback to all players. Players favoured overwhelming GPA proposal over new GAA proposal.
  • October 2016 GAA Proposal discussed at GPA Player Safety and Welfare meeting to assess any implications on welfare of inter county players.
  • November 2016 GPA National Executive Committee updated on current position.
  • December 2016 at Annual GPA Rep Summit workshop on strategic issues including competition structures and GAA proposal.
  • February 2016 consultation with National Executive Committee on motions for Congress including GAA proposal.
  • February 2016 final consultation with all squad reps. Consensus reached as to how the GPA delegate should vote at Congress.
  • Over 70% of squads voted against proposal of ‘Super 8’ format."

 




Most Read Stories